Archive for the ‘Free Market’ Category

GOP For Tax Breaks, Except When Democrats Are

Friday, January 29th, 2010

Obama had a lot of bad ideas in his State of the Union address. But one good one was tax credits for businesses that hire workers. This seems like the kind of smart governance we sorely need—a welcome break from the backwards thinking that tends to be the norm. Rhode Island, for example, has had such difficulty in keeping up with unemployment benefits, it has had to borrow about $127 million from the federal government. In order to avoid even more debt, however, the state is looking to raise unemployment taxes on businesses, which means even less money in the pot for hiring. In other words, state unemployment benefits could drive unemployment higher. A tax credit, however, could give businesses incentives to hire, reduce the amount they owe in taxes, and avoid higher spending.

So conservatives should be all over this one, right? Well, The Heritage Foundation isn’t. And check out this House Republican response which ignores the credit and just talks about all the other taxes Obama is cooking up. So what’s so bad about the tax credit? Well, all The Heritage Foundation says that it didn’t work because small businesses didn’t know about it. But isn’t that easy to fix? Heritage also predict that the credit will prolong unemployment because businesses will put off hiring until they can get the credit. But wait, I thought businesses wouldn’t know about it anyway? For another perspective, check out this New York Times story, which cites specific sources and a study that say the tax credit did and will work.

In truth, the tax credit is something that Republicans should at least welcome, if not embrace. How do I know this? Because Republicans already have. Back in Rhode Island, the Republican governor proposed a similar tax credit at the state level. And even Rep. Eric Cantor, the House Republican whip, praised the idea. But then he changed his mind after a ‘closed-door’ House GOP meeting.

Health Care: When Conservatives Don’t Like Markets

Tuesday, October 20th, 2009

One of the overlooked aspects of health care reform is the proposal for a national health insurance exchange, where small businesses and individuals could choose from a broader selection of plans than is normally available in their states. Conservatives, especially those with libertarian leanings, are always talking about how much they love market competition and consumer choice. So they should be all over this proposal for a national health insurance market? Right?

Nope. In fact, their response mostly has been one of silence. In a search through the Web sites for National Review and The Weekly Standard—easily the two most influential conservative magazines—the exchanges were mentioned only in connection with worries that illegal immigrants would be able to participate in them. Of course, most conservative criticism has understandably harped on the projected $1 trillion cost and $400 billion in new taxes associated with health care reform. But one wishes conservatives would stop their sky-is-falling mantras long enough to admit there might be a few things in health care reform that they don’t find totally repugnant.

So far, however, only The Heritage Foundation seems to be taking this idea of health insurance exchanges seriously. This Heritage policy expert is correct in warning that the combination of a national insurance exchange and a heavily subsidized public option could be a scheme to drive out private insurance. But, until the details of how this exchange would work are hashed out, it is easy to imagine other scenarios as does this Washington Post writer and this study by the Urban Institute.